Archive for the ‘Natuaral Online Reputation’ Category

BP – A Classic Example Of What Is Wrong With Aggressive Reputation Management

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

Am I alone in my believe that aggressive reputation management as a professional practice is right up there with personal injury lawyers! Every day there are numerous blogs and articles that highlight BP’s efforts to manage, preserve and protect their reputation in light of their creating the biggest man made disaster in history to soil our waters and shores.

Call me crazy, but when you distort the truth it is called deception. The dictionary defines deception as 1: the act of deceiving 2: the fact or condition of being deceived 3: FRAUD, TRICK.

I don’t like being deceived and I think most people feel the same way. So I find it rather disingenuous when reputation management professionals are offended by BP’s efforts to manually prop up their reputation. Aside from scale, BP’s reputation management efforts are no more despicable than when social media is manipulated and corrupted using generally accepted reputation management practices to influence local purchase decisions that might not otherwise be made.

Social media is totally open and prone to abuse and I get that. But I also feel that social media has an awesome opportunity to empower people with information to make better purchase decisions when buying a product or choosing a local business. Currently, social media has more influence on consumers than traditional advertising because there is a believe that it is more objective. Aggressive reputation management can and does exploit this currently. In doing so it also erodes consumers trust in social media.

I encourage local businesses to invest in their people, products and services to increase their competitiveness. Embrace social media to capture the voice of your customers. Use it as a platform to communicated messages both good and bad. Those who do it early and authentically will create a sustainable competitive advantage over their competitors who adopt a strategy of reputation management to compensate for defects in their service delivery.

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer
Trust FX

BP Reputation Management FAIL

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

As I read Rachel Andersen’s post on BP’s Reputation Management efforts, she raises a common issue regarding the aggressive use of social media and reputation management.

BP’s oil spill is a disaster beyond compare no doubt. Rachel’s distrust and disgust with BP  is very appropriate and shared by most. But aside from the scale of the oil spill problem, how is the aggressive use of reputation management techniques by any company to hide or spin their problems any different?   Basically social media is being manipulated in an attempt to craft an artificial image with the goal of capturing consumer dollars that they might not otherwise be able to do.

One of the key values of social media is that it empowered people based on sharing knowledge and experiences freely. As people learn more about how social media is being gamed in to manage one reputation it will increasingly become as irrelevant as traditional advertising in it’s ability to inform and influence.

Aggressive reputation management sounds kind of shifty to me!

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer
Trust FX

Don’t Be Afraid Of Negative Consumer Reviews – Authentic Reputation Management Works

Monday, June 28th, 2010

One of the biggest concerns that I hear from business owners about social media, is their fear of negative reviews. They fear that negative feedback will sour potential customers or patients that read it. The proliferation of reputation management services speak to the fear of negative feedback and the desire to present a “managed reputation”.

As a business owner, you know that not every one of your customers has been completely satisfied and for as much as you try, it most likely will happen again. Guess what, your prospects know this too. Everyone has had their share of bad experiences even though testimonials and references that they relied on to make an “informed” decision, painted a perfect picture.

But don’t be afraid of negative reviews. A recent Forrester report found the 50 percent of online shoppers proceeded with a purchase after reading negative reviews on it.

Forrester evaluated 4,000 reviews in the Electronics and Home & Garden categories on the Amazon.com site and found that more than 80% of the reviews were positive – and the negative reviews were generally considered helpful to consumers. While the data was derived from a retail Web site, Forrester says these findings are applicable to any vertical site from travel to auto, financial services

The point is that the presence of negative reviews doesn’t prevent sales. I am not suggesting that mediocrity is a marketable advantage, but projecting a competitive reputation that is authentic will increase the ability of your marketing messages to connect with people looking for the services that you provide and will produce better business results. I will also say, that there exists a window of opportunity to create a sustainable competitive advantage for those businesses and practices who adopt the lessons learned from their pioneering online retailers.

Consumers seek out and are more influenced by an accurate representation of your reputation than an air-brushed managed reputation. This is why consumers value ratings-and-reviews so much. People are more likely to believe and be influenced by what your customers and patients say about your business or practice than what you say. This is the power of a Natural Online Reputation.

Negative reviews demonstrate transparency and honesty. A robust and strong Natural Reputation with some negative reviews or constructive feedback will out perform perfect reputations because its perceived authenticity will increase its credibility and power of influence.

Local businesses can learn much from a decade of online purchases and seeing what has been effective at influencing online purchases. A usability survey conducted by PowerReviews showed that consumers don’t believe in perfect “products”, they expect some level of dissatisfaction and often “DISCOUNT” products with perfect reviews. So the money that you are spending to create that perfectly manicured managed reputation could actually be costing you business!

As more people use the Internet to find a local business, they bring with them their experience and expectations from their past online purchases. Smart business owners will be those who shed the old mentality of projecting an artificial image and embrace the power of social media to attract and influence people seeking the services that they provide.

I say invest your money and resources in improving you people, products and services. Focus on understanding your customers’ needs, set proper expectations and consistently meet them. If you do this well, you will be able to attract new customers and patients with greater efficiency and at a lower costs than every before possible using the authentic voice of your customers and patients.

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer
TrustFX

Natural Online Reputations – An Introduction

Monday, June 21st, 2010

A natural online reputation is the most effective way for a local business or a medical practice to attract new customers or patients. Today’s increasingly skeptical consumers want to make decisions with confidence and nothing builds more trust or instills more confidence than the authentic voice of real customers and patients.

Natural reputations have two defining characteristics that increase their power of influence over all other reputation management services. First, reviews are captured entirely from real customers and patients so they are completely authentic. Second, reviews are not filtered and include both positive and negative reviews. This is very important for consumers. For the first time they have a trusted resource that speaks to the quality of service and the consistency by which it is delivered. This makes natural online reputations the best predictor of future customer satisfaction.

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer
Trust FX
Natural online reviews also increase a businesses visibility in Google as they actively search for consumer ratings for inclusion in their organic search results. But equally important, they increase the credibility of businesses that use them which translates to more leads, increased prospect conversion rates, stronger pricing and better retention. Small gains in each area can have a major impact on the profitability of most small businesses.

The Role Of Trust And Authenticity To Influence Local Purchase Decisions

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

Consumer reviews are the most credible form of advertising in their ability to influence purchase decisions. There effectiveness to attract customers and drive higher conversion rates online is well documented.  Every major ecommerce site uses them because they work and consumers demand them!  They are so effective that having them is no longer an option as consumers will shop elsewhere.

The need and value of consumer reviews is even greater when it come to selecting local businesses like Realtors, caterers and home contractors. The cost and risk of such transactions are much higher than most online purchases and often they have long term consequences. The resources available to consumers to evaluate local businesses are nil aside from referrals and word of mouth.

The same tools that have worked well online are not adequate for local businesses. The threshold of authenticity and credibility of reviews needed for them to influence purchased decisions is much higher.  Whereas authenticity online can be managed via the digital shopping cart, there isn’t any such equivalent for local businesses.

In the presentation “Reputation Management – The Role of Trust to Influence Decisions” I speak to the relationship that exist between trust and the risk / cost of a transaction. But equally important is the relationship between the authenticity of the trust agent and its effectiveness to influence purchase decisions.

Natural Online Reputations give quality businesses a way to establish authentic and credible online reputations that that will enable them to attract, close and retain high value customers.

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer
Trust FX

Natural Online Reputation Marketing – Rule 6 Transparency

Friday, April 16th, 2010

There is a direct correlation between the transparency of the rating service and its power to influence consumer decisions.

What is most important to consumers and owners of good businesses in a rating and review site is the authenticity of the reviews. If consumers have to guess if individual reviews are authentic, it diminishes the influence of the entire site. If bad or mediocre businesses can game the ratings to inflate their reputations, they effectively eliminate an important component of competitive differentiation for good businesses.

Behind authenticity in importance to consumers and quality businesses is the transparency of the rating site. The posting processes should be clearly defined, including:

  • Who can post a review?
  • How are reviewers authenticated, if at all?
  • How are reviews authenticated, if at all?How do you know if the person writing the review actually completed a purchase from the business that they are reviewing? Most sites can not do this!
  • Can reviews be deleted or modified?
  • If reviews are modified can you see its history?
  • How are reviews listed? Can businesses pay to suppress or bury poor reviews?
  • What is the revenue model? Who pays users, businesses or 3rd party advertisers?
  • How are scores calculated? Are scores weighted by “popularity” gimmicks?

Every site generates revenue from at least one of three sources consumers, businesses or from advertising.

Sites where users (consumers) pay, you would expect listed businesses to have very limited or no control of their reviews. This type is site is typically focused on consumers.

Sites where businesses pay and there are limited or no authentication of reviews you can expect the businesses to have greater influence on posted reviews.

And of course there are sites that make money from both consumers who pay to use the site and from businesses that can pay for premium listings. I think these sites have an identity crisis or might just be looking out for themselves, but they are profitable!

We all agree that more transparency is better than less. Consumers get to make more informed decisions and quality businesses can achieve meaningful competitive differentiation.

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer

Natural Online Reputation Marketing – Rule 5 Authenticate Reviewers

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

All reviewers must be authenticated to insure the authenticity of individual reviews and the credibility of the review site. Specifically, the identity of the reviewer is authenticated by the review site but is not shared with the business being reviewed.

The openness and the accessibility of social media are both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness. This is particularly problematic in the area of consumer ratings and reviews of local businesses. Most fake reviews are created by people using fake identities. Most rating sites only require users to have an email account to post reviews. So authenticating the reviewer is a key step in managing the authenticity of individual reviews and eliminates the largest opportunity to create fake reviews.

The motivation behind writing fake reviews is that consumer reviews have a big influence on consumer purchase decisions. When you Google a local business and they just have a couple bad reviews, the tendency is to skip over them. On the other hand, if they have a lot of positive reviews you give them greater consideration as your trust in them is higher.

It’s very common practice for business owners write positive reviews about their businesses to attract customers. Unscrupulous business owners write disparaging reviews about their competitors to dissuade potential prospects.
Average people write volumes of fake reviews too. You have your college students who bang out 20 reviews for free StarBucks coffee. . . who can blame them? . . . for 50 reviews you can get a digital camera! Incentives like these are frequently offered by the big rating sites to build “content” in when they enter new markets.

Writing fake reviews also turns out to be quite therapeutic. Disgruntled employees, job applicants, vendors and potential customers write some of the most thoughtful and passionate reviews. They motivation is that they feel that they have been wronged in some way by the business of their affection.

This problem is so prevalent that Yelp adopted a policy of not posting reviews until the registered reviewer posted some number of reviews. The logic behind this is that many people writing a fake review will create a new email address for it. OK, so this just encourages the writing of more bad reviews since the reviewer has to write multiple reviews covering multiple businesses in order for their targeted review to stick. Brilliant!

And not go to go without mention, we also have the reputation management folks. A common operating procedure that they employ is the practice is writing positive content to craft a positive online image for their clients. Sometimes this includes writing fake positive reviews and although I haven’t come across this I’m sure that some of them also sprinkle in a smattering of negative reviews for good measure.

Authenticating reviewers with the rating service protects the identity of individual reviewers but also is a key step in insuring the authenticity of reviews by addressing the aforementioned challenges and many more.

The value of ratings and reviews to consumer as a decision making tool increases with their authenticity. Authentic consumer reviews is also an effective SMB marketing strategy for quality businesses. Authentic consumer reviews have four times more influence on driving consumer purchases than other forms of advertising. It’s no wonder that there is so much abuse.

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer
Trust FX

Natural Online Reputation Marketing – Rule 4 No Do Over’s

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Authentic customer reviews can not be changed or edited once they are posted. This is a very important rule that affects the credibility of the rating service and the integrity of its scores. Many businesses that have problems managing consistent customer satisfaction dislike this rule.

The key value of a Natural Reputation is its ability to predict future customer satisfaction. When the rating site allows posted reviews to be changed, it means that bad reviews can be replaced with good reviews. Rating sites that allow reviews to be edited, eliminate their predictive value of the scores for consumers because they are no longer relevant. Modifying reviews also eliminates competitive differentiation for good businesses as their inferior competitors appear to be equals when in reality they are not.

Think about this from your own perspective. If you are evaluating two businesses that have comparable consumer ratings, would it influence you decision if you knew that one of the businesses edited 10 percent of their reviews and the other didn’t? Exactly, for reviews to be predictive you want to know how well a business satisfies its customers but you also must know how consistently they do it.

When scores can be edited, it promotes and rewards businesses to adopt bad behaviors. Less scrupulous businesses will use aggressive or deceptive sales tactics to close more sales but at the expense of customer satisfaction. Because dissatisfied customers change their reviews in exchange for remediation or “bribes” bad business practices are hidden. Consumers don’t know that they are being gamed because the company has a “great” reputation. It is easy to believe that their problems were an anomaly and they buy into the contrived “we are soooo sorry, our reputation is everything, please help us keep our hard earned reputation intact”. At any given price level, consumers when given accurate information will chose to go with the better company and avoid the drama, aggravation and added expense associated with correcting problems.

Some rating companies describe this feature as a benefit to consumers. They claim to offer assistance in resolving customer complaints. It sounds good at a basic level but what it really means is that they are able to collect additional fees from businesses to edit or remove bad reviews. I’m sure that they ask the business to fix the customer complaint, but who determines if the customer is happy or whether the business provided sufficient good effort? Almost every rating site allows this because not to do it also reduces their business opportunity considerably. When review edits are not permitted, only good businesses can successfully use the service.

Every consumer wants to know what they are buying up front before they sign the dotted line. Consumer review sites that allow reviews to be edited, hide valuable information that diminished their usefulness as a decision making resource.

Trust FX’s, philosophy is to provides complete transparency. This creates strong incentives for businesses to set proper expectations with every customer and then to meet those expectations consistently. Eliminating review edits also reinforces good behavior by providing strong incentives for businesses to address problems quickly and treat customer honestly and with fairness.

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer

Natural Online Reputation Marketing – Rule 3 Anonymity

Monday, April 12th, 2010

The third rule for creating a natural online reputation (NOR) is anonymity. People are more willing to give feedback and with greater honesty when their identity is protected.

Anonymity also reduces the potential for abuse by businesses and consumers. When reviews are anonymous its harder for a business to bribe it’s customers to write fake reviews. Anonymity also reduces a customers’ ability to threat a business with a negative review in order to get additional discounts.

Personal privacy is very important and is protected by anonymity. A person may not want the public, their employer or even their friends to know what health care professionals they are seeing. But, their honest feedback is still very important. Not only does it help the health care provider to improve their service, honest feedback helps other consumers make better decisions.
As a business owner, it is invaluable to know what your customers, clients, and patients think of your people, products and services on a constant basis. Many things can influence your customers feelings about your business. Some of them are due to internal changes, like when you make changes in your staff, your pricing or in your services. External events can also have an impact on how your customers view the value of your services and hence their satisfaction. You can not impact the economy or political changes, but with the right knowledge you can adjust your business to respond to such changes when needed.

The more attuned business owners are with their customers feelings, the faster they can address problems (when they are still small and relatively inexpensive to correct) or fully exploit strengths to maintain a competitive advantage. In either case, successful businesses are those who know what their customers really feel. This requires a constant stream of honest customer feedback. Adopting an anonymous feedback system is your most effective way to monitor the pulse of your customers. It also builds a highly credible natural online reputation that will drive inbound marketing.

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer
Trust FX

Natural Online Reputation Marketing – Rule 2 Exclusion

Friday, April 9th, 2010

The second rule for creating a natural online reputation (NOR) is that of exclusion. A natural online reputation reflects the average level of customer satisfaction. The operative word here is “customer”. The most valuable feedback is that of real customers who have completed a purchase from the business being reviewed.
Obviously fake reviews created by employees, competitors, vendors or college students writing bogus reviews for “free” stuff need to be excluded because they are not relevant. Not every business is a good match for every consumer, so the most important feedback comes from actual customers.

Andrew Ward
Chief Trust Officer